Jump to content
Xtreme .Net Talk

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just realize that VB.NET is very similar to Java!! Everything is an object!! Including data types and arrays... Which means to say that Java Programmers are easier to port into VB.NET!!

 

Too bad!! If I could have learn Java at the ealier time...

Nothing is impossible in Programming! So, take it easy and let us all share your problem. :)
Posted

hmmm...

VB.NET offers the full features of an OOP language. While VB 6 dont support things like implementation, inheritence ,real polymorphism and method overloading etc. It do, but to certain extent.. I will say limited!..

 

So, Java programmers might like it!..

 

But i dont think they will gonna move towards VB.Net. I have some feedback about it, and i guess those who are doing Java deeply, dont want to move back.. Like ME, who dont want to do Java, even i know it well!.

:)

 

I just Love VB!

Regards,

Anis

Miles to go Before I Sleep.

Posted

Looks very true thinker!...

I have heard VB.Net will be a competitor of java in near future.

Regards,

Anis

Miles to go Before I Sleep.

  • *Gurus*
Posted

Thinker, you make MS sound quite nasty when you say that, which I suppose they are if you look at it in a certain way. Certainly if they were using their monopoly to try and beat Java.

 

Truth is, they've come up with a better solution.

MVP, Visual Developer - .NET

 

Now you see why evil will always triumph - because good is dumb.

 

My free .NET Windows Forms Controls and Articles

Posted

And .NET framework will most probably be the winner of this competition because I have seen what VB.NET can but Java cannot even with the latest Java SDK 1.4!

 

In fact, learning either .NET or Java will bring advantages to the programmers.. because as I said, they are quite similar.. and it lowers the learning curve for either programmers...

Nothing is impossible in Programming! So, take it easy and let us all share your problem. :)
  • *Gurus*
Posted
...Certainly if they were using their monopoly to try and beat Java.

 

Truth is, they've come up with a better solution.

 

It can be both. The point is, it isn't revolutionary, it is merely

evolutionary, and hardly original.

Posted

re: Thinker

 

The point is, it isn't revolutionary, it is merely

evolutionary, and hardly original.

Well... yeah. But then, you'd be hard pressed to name an MS application that you couldn't say that about. It's been their trademark since they started. All the way back to the original DOS (no, Bill Gates didn't write it, he bought it). :)
  • *Gurus*
Posted

Quite true, thus I can never seem to get over the surprise that

people express when I or someone else tells them that the latest

and greatest from MS is just version x of someone else's idea.

 

I always thought it was an advantage when learning something

new, to understand its roots. Chances are, once the latest lingo

has been translated into terms I already know, I am 75-90% of

the way in completely understanding it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...