Tuppence Posted November 13, 2003 Posted November 13, 2003 I'm running Visual Studio .NET 2002 Academic and have tried to install the DX9 SDK but it wont work. I have read this thread because I get the same "missing microsoft.directx.dll" error message but the solutions proposed there didnt help :( I have tried installing the DX9 SDK (about 220MB) and the DX9 SDK Update Summer 2003 (about 170MB) but I get the same result with both... It seems like people using VS .NET 2003 have no problems with this so if it wont work because I am running an "old" version of VS please let me know because I can't find anything about incompatibility issues... Thanks in advance Jesper Quote
Moderators Robby Posted November 13, 2003 Moderators Posted November 13, 2003 One of the requirements is VS 2003 Quote Visit...Bassic Software
Moderators Robby Posted November 13, 2003 Moderators Posted November 13, 2003 I read the MS list of requirements and they don't mention VS 2003, but I do know for a fact that I read it somewhere that you must have 2003. Quote Visit...Bassic Software
Darc Posted November 13, 2003 Posted November 13, 2003 I run Visual Studio 2002 with it, and it runs fine. Quote
Moderators Robby Posted November 14, 2003 Moderators Posted November 14, 2003 I checked my resource, it was mobile devices not DirectX, sorry Quote Visit...Bassic Software
wyrd Posted November 14, 2003 Posted November 14, 2003 I have VS 2002 Academic, and I have to manually reference the libraries with the "browse" button. Quote Gamer extraordinaire. Programmer wannabe.
Tuppence Posted November 14, 2003 Author Posted November 14, 2003 Maybe I should just get the 2003 version and save myself some time :-\ I've tried referencing the files manually but I cant get to work... never done that before though so not so sure I did it correct :rolleyes: Only place I could find settings for adding paths and stuff was some C++ settings and since I'm using C#.... well, I dont know, VS 2003 sounds like a good idea :p /Jesper Quote
steved Posted November 14, 2003 Posted November 14, 2003 Probably a wise idea. Although 2003 was a "C++ release," much in the same way that 2005 will (unfortunately) be a "VB release," there were plenty of C# changes between 2002 and 2003 to make buying it worthwhile. I cringe when I have to use 2002. :) Quote zig?
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.