Huh, I didn't get any popups or anything attempting to get me to download on their site. Funny.
The concept looks rather interesting, but I think the sticking points would be price and/or performance.
That would not work at all (as I read it described) for the project I'm working on now, which so far has about 50 tables and is only maybe 1/10th the project (estimated about 400+ tables when done) and so many are used with multiple other tables.
But if it were as easy as it says and inexpensive I'd use that for some personal projects.
There's a persist-objects-and-collections to sql database table example that I have posted in the code library on the sister site that may be use to you. It's not ORM but a half-way house...
I much prefer custom objects that I have 1000% control over. Every event, every wiggle, every add, etc.
Instead my company went with the TypedDataSets because they're super fast to get set up, you have a good (if tricky and sometimes shadily documented) control over data and it hooks up fast/easy to databinding controls.
Really in the most important matters they would both do what is nessicary, so I lost my objects
Just saw the prices... At over a thousand US dollars, that exceeds my hobby program price limit Funny how the price is in Euros, but the number formatting isn't european?
Just saw the prices... At over a thousand US dollars, that exceeds my hobby program price limit Funny how the price is in Euros, but the number formatting isn't european?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.