hmmm, Virtual PC running Linux.
Might be what I'm looking for to try linux out.
It struck me as quite humorous in the knowledge base, seeing Microsoft giving tech support on Linux
Actually I was just thinking how frickin awesome it would be if you could install Virtual PC over a VERY barebones OS. I mean like Old Skool DOS, bare bones in terms of resources.
Then you could use the program as an interface and install whatever OS you want. It would be a slight performance hit running your primary OS (2000, XP, 98, etc) as it would be virtual, but being able to press Alt+Tab and flip between Linux, OS X and Windows 2000 really has me interested.
I don't know if OSX works, it says any x386 compatable OS, which OS Anything isn't. But the Mac version of Virtual PC runs x386 programs. I don't see why the PC version couldn't do the reverse.
Instead of having one OS tightly integrated into your system, you'd have 2+ OS's lightly (but equally) integrated into your system.
Get a 100+ gig hard drive, 700something megs of ram (what comes after 512?) and a 2ghz proccessor and you'd be set to run any OS you'd like, or multiple at once.
I think that would be really killer for developing cross platform software, testing compatability...
As it stands right now, if Virtual PC for Windows can't run OS X by the time a .Net Framework comes out for OS X, I'm going to switch to a G4 or G5 powerbook/titanium and run windows virtually.
Is it really healthy to enjoy developing software for an OS that you don't really prefer? I mean I have like zero interest in OS X software for some reason. I don't even know what langauge you'd write it in. C/C++? Smarttalk? ::shrugs::