At work I'm doing .Net. I'm in the begining stages of converting a legacy database product over to VB.Net 2005.
Aside from not really touching .Net for a few months, working in 2005 is really humbling. ADO.Net has really changed. I think it's for the better, it's so much easier than I remember it... though it's still different.
It's sort of frustrating all the bugs I get between Visual Studio 2005 (far and away mostly display corruptions) and SQL CTP 2005 (the damned thing won't install with the same options on any two computers!). But I have SQL CTP 2005 basically running on my machine enough to serve a database (no extra features) and VS2005 can do some of the basic SQL Server functions.
But with how soon 2005 is comming out it would have been silly to go forward with 2003 and then convert again. In fact I'm just hoping they don't change things I'm learning for the final release. I'd think that beta2 means that most of the functionality is there, just needing to fill out error handling and catching bugs and whatnot.
Aside from not really touching .Net for a few months, working in 2005 is really humbling. ADO.Net has really changed. I think it's for the better, it's so much easier than I remember it... though it's still different.
It's sort of frustrating all the bugs I get between Visual Studio 2005 (far and away mostly display corruptions) and SQL CTP 2005 (the damned thing won't install with the same options on any two computers!). But I have SQL CTP 2005 basically running on my machine enough to serve a database (no extra features) and VS2005 can do some of the basic SQL Server functions.
But with how soon 2005 is comming out it would have been silly to go forward with 2003 and then convert again. In fact I'm just hoping they don't change things I'm learning for the final release. I'd think that beta2 means that most of the functionality is there, just needing to fill out error handling and catching bugs and whatnot.