gdboling
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
gdboling's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
0
Reputation
-
I come from a J2EE/STRUTS background. With struts there is a "resource" file where I can specify things like common error message, common label values, etc. The purpose in that is so that there is one file to change those values instead of searching through all the code. Also, for international purposes. You simply declare a resource file for each language. I know that in the web.config file I can specify an <AppSettings> attribute and specify some common things like I mentioned above. My question is, is this the only "accepted" method of doing this. And also, can you specify a seperate config file that contains only the <AppSettings> and if so, how do I tell my web app to use that as well as the web.config file. Thanks for any help. Gregg
-
In my learning process I have an asp page that has several combobox's that will be populated from a database. I was able to get one populated, but then I wondered, Do I have to have a seperate SqlDataAdapter for every single combo box? Or can I re-use the DataAdapter I have and issue seperate SQL commands to gather my information? I realize that I am going to have to have a DataSet and DataView for each one, but I would like some info on reusing a DataAdapter. Thanks. Gregg
-
But with what you just said, then there may be a best method if you take into account security and being able to pass objects around. And I would assume that keeping with the same passing method throughout the web app would be preferred?
-
While learning how to do this in ASP.NET I ran across several different solutions. Server.Transfer Request.QueryString Request.Param Session[] Is there a BEST method to use, or does it always depend on the context of the web app? Thanks. Gregg PS. The only one I could ever get to work right was when using Server.Transfer which seems like a pretty good method anyway.
-
wyrd, I see your point. However, most of what I do with my web site requires me to store more on my web server than just informational web sites typicall do. So while I may not need 1200 MB, the MB/$$ is better than any I have seen. As far as the DB goes, it doesn't matter to me so long as I have one. I could use Access for all I care. Performance is not really an issue (we won't get into MySQL vs Ms SSQL ;) ). But thanks for your input. I will deffinatly keep all in mind while I am making my decisions. :)
-
An MS SQL Server is not important to me. MySQL is just fine. :) I will check out the time zone differences. Thanks for the heads-up.
-
There are some good features included with those packages, however, a lot of them I will never use. And I am really looking for more MB for the $$$. And 50 MB just won't cut it. I have about 130 MB used at my current hosting company, and I don't even have any ASP stuff their. :)
-
I found a pretty good deal for ASP.NET Web Hosting here: http://www.digitalibiz.com/hosting/ComparePackages.asp I am considering the Premium package and was wondering if anyone new of any better deals than this one. Also, wanted to let everyone else know about this service in case it was the best deal out there. Thanks. Gregg
-
Perfect, exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
-
Ok, so can you help me with a server side .net code block then? Is it even possible what I am asking about? Thanks. Gregg
-
Great! Thanks. Gregg
-
I am just getting started with ASP.NET and had a question. Consider the following simple code <script runat="server"> Sub submit(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) lbl1.Text="Hello " & txt1.Text & "!" End Sub </script> <html> <body><form runat="server"> Your name: <asp:TextBox id="txt1" runat="server" /> <asp:Button OnClick="submit" Text="Submit" runat="server" /> <p><asp:Label id="lbl1" runat="server" /></p> </form></body> </html> Can you put the <script> block in a completely seperate file and use it on that page? Thanks. Gregg